“Construction should be decorated. Decoration should never be purposely constructed.”- The Grammar of Ornament, 1856, Owen Jones.
Owen Jones was an 18th century designer who felt people must abide by his theory stated above. In 1856, Jones published The Grammar of Ornament, a book of his beliefs and concepts in great hope of encouraging others to follow his lead. Jones and other designers such as A.W.N. Pugin believed believed that the aesthetic beauty of an object is of secondary priority whereas the functional properties of it is of top priority. Objects that were overpowered by its decoration to the point where you could not clearly see its construction or purpose were disapproved by Jones, they were seen as immoral and dishonest.
21st Century Fashion Glasses |
To the right is an example of design where its aesthetic beauty interrupts its known functionality. In regards to its known functionality, I believe it is unnecessary to aesthetically create such a design where you can no longer see through the 'lens'. However, in the 21st century, celebrities for example, will almost definitely wear this sort of design because it 'looks good', not because they need to see better or protect their eyes from sun rays. Even though I agree with Jones wherein decoration should never be purposely constructed, in this case, the known function for glasses isn't the intended function for these 21st century designed glasses - it is obviously not to improve ones eye sight, but is to raise ones fashion sense, because that is its [new] function, we can say it does serve its purpose.
I accept Jones' and Pugins statement, but only to a point where design should meet its functional purpose. It can be difficult to justify design in the way where the intention of someone else may not be the intention of yours. I do not agree that all designers should essentially be in unity. I believe that you must have your right to your own creative mind. Restricting thoughts and processes to a standard level very much would lessen our creative world. Individuality would no longer exist if we were all to 'creatively think' as one.